Federal election 2016: OPINION - High risk for PM in a Herbert by-election

Share on Social Media

The Australian July 29, 2016

Weighing up the risks versus rewards of going back to the polls in Herbert is no easy judgment for Malcolm Turnbull.

By-elections can be inherently dangerous for governments, even more so when a court order rather than a death or resignation is the reason for the fresh vote. It can look like a case of sour grapes, irrespective of the validity of the legal complaint.

The bookies have installed Ewen Jones as early favourite if a Herbert by-election does ensue. The government would love to grab an extra seat, bumping its tally to 77 and giving it some room to move in the House of Representatives.

The extra seat would also help the Prime Minister claim the election result was stronger than it is currently seen by many.

Plus winning such a by-election would be used to build momentum that Turnbull doesn’t have at the moment, with comparisons to the Aston by-election in 2001 that turned around the Howard government’s fortunes inevitable.

A poor result for Labor could also put Bill Shorten under early pressure. We know Anthony Albanese was circling before the better-than-expected election result for Labor.

These upsides don’t necessarily outweigh the risks in a by-election for Turnbull. Voters can turn cynical when it comes to court challenges forcing a new vote.

That’s what happened in Lindsay in 1996 when Labor’s defeated frontbencher Ross Free sought to beat Jackie Kelly a second time around, after her candidature was deemed invalid at the general election.

Kelly increased her margin, partly because voters thought Labor’s challenge was sour grapes. There have been other similar examples, including at the state level.

The biggest risk for Turnbull is that defeat in a Herbert by-election defines him as a failure, immediately after winning a majority at the election. It would give his detractors the narrative they need to continue to undermine his authority.

That’s the last thing the PM can afford after an election that saw the government lose so many seats and much of its mandate to be bold.

2016 ELECTION RESULT - Cathy O’Toole wins Herbert for Labor by 37 votes, AEC says

Share on Social Media


The Australian Electoral Commission has confirmed that Labor’s Cathy O’Toole has won the Queensland seat of Herbert by a mere 37 votes, leaving the government with a majority of one.

The extremely close result in the Townsville-based seat held by former government whip Ewen Jones increases the likelihood that the Coalition will launch a challenge in the Court of Disputed Returns.

Ms O’Toole posted a victory message on her Facebook page this afternoon.

“THANK YOU to the people of Herbert,” she wrote.

“I am honored and privileged to have won this amazing hard fought election.

“I am ready and rearing to get into representing this great community.”

Special Minister of State Scott Ryan declined to confirm that court action would be pursued, but said the writ would likely be returned a week from tomorrow and there would then be 40 days available for a challenge to be launched.

“It’s marginally less than 40 days on this occasion due to some administrative arrangements, but let’s just say that it’s about 40 days from next weekend,” Mr Ryan told Sky News.

The Senate count is also due to be finalised this week, with results to be known in South Australia and Western Australia tomorrow, Victoria and Queensland on Tuesday, and New South Wales on Wednesday.

OPINION - Results count despite the uniform

Share on Social Media

Ross EastgateAs prophesied last week defence and veterans matters as discrete political issues have failed to inspire the Australian electorate. While the final election tally is still far from clear, veteran-based special interest group candidates have polled abysmally.

Perhaps the most dismal performance was by the Australian Liberty Alliance which strongly identified with the wider defence community.
Despite a slick social media presence and its self-promoting leader, former intelligence officer Bernard Gaynor, ALA attracted less than one per cent of the national senate vote, outpolled in some states by the Australian Sex Party.

Despite also making loud noises about defence and veterans’ issues the Jacqui Lambie Network senate candidates trailed even further behind, though comfortably ahead of the Palmer United Party. Except in Tasmania where JLN may yet secure one senator.

Former ADF personnel who ran as candidates for the major political parties fared much better despite some who declared their military links attracting the ire of the anonymous Canberra-based spokeswoman who apparently adjudicates such matters.

Colonel Dr The Honourable Mike Kelly regained the southern NSW Eden-Monaro electorate, considered since its inception as a "bell wether" seat for the incumbent government. The former ADF lawyer and Labor assistant defence minister felt compelled however to resign from the Army Reserve during the campaign lest ADF HQ be somehow offended by that link.

Former brigadier and infantryman Andrew Nickolic lost Bass for the LNP in Tasmania in an almost clean sweep for Labor, save Denison held by independent and former infantryman Andrew Wilkie, who has shown little interest pursuing veterans’ interests in his parliamentary career so far.

Former cavalryman, major and gay activist Pat O’Neill, the Labor candidate who so deeply offended the ADF spokeswoman by showing himself in uniform on his campaign posters was soundly defeated in Brisbane.

Sexuality was not an issue because the victorious LNP candidate also identified as gay, although the transgender Veteran’s Party candidate, a former captain and infanteer, ran a miserable last.

Former SAS officer Andrew Hastie who courageously defied Canberra’s anonymous ADF spokeswoman on uniform matters comfortably retained the West Australian seat of Canning.

Former intelligence officer Stuart Robert comfortably retained the Fadden electorate, though no one is holding their breath hoping the fallen ex-veterans’ affairs minister might actually interest himself in veterans’ issues.

There is some excitement not to mention expectation that second-time Labor candidate Luke Gosling who captured the previous CLP stronghold Solomon might become a strong veterans’ voice in parliament. Solomon has a significant defence presence including Darwin’s Larrakeyah Barracks and the Palmerston-based 1st Brigade. The former infantryman who was awarded an OAM in 2006 and who has been active assisting remote NT and Timor-L‘Este communities has retained close links with the extended defence community.

With Herbert still undecided, whoever wins the Townsville electorate will need to demonstrate a strong, active commitment to veterans’ issues even in the face of past indifference by either major party.

The only remaining issue is whether unsuccessful candidates might get their uniforms back should they so desire.

OPINION - PETER SWITZER - Can our economy stand us voting for Ronald McDonald lookalikes?

Share on Social Media

OPINION - Peter Switzer. Published: Monday, July 04, 2016

peter new normalFollowing the election we didn’t have to have now, it’s pretty clear (as the old Cape Kennedy warning went): “Houston, we have a problem.” In fact, we have more than one problem and it’s going to take a great leader to change things for the better.

On Saturday, for Weekend Switzer, I wrote about leadership under the headline “A leader with guts. How good would that be?”.

Clearly, Malcolm didn’t read it after his crazy, ‘hide in the house’ stunt on Saturday night, which ultimately saw him flushed out by Alan Jones on the Seven Network’s coverage.

Meanwhile, over on Sky News, Andrew Bolt was calling for Malcolm to resign. On the ABC, they were waiting for Bill Shorten to make an appearance — that was gripping TV!

On the night, I’d been invited to go to the Carlton versus Collingwood match at the MCG, which was an arm wrestle akin to the election battle going on at the same time, but at least there was a winner.

I knew the poll would be close after going to a shop in Melbourne on Saturday morning, where the owner told me he was going to vote for Ronald McDonald. When I asked him why, he said he could never vote for Bill Shorten — “a union puppet” — and he expressed disappointment in Malcolm Turnbull.

His store is new-age but he listens to Alan Jones via the internet and, in fact, he said he rang 2GB after Alan interviewed the PM to say what a “soft interview” it was!

I asked why he wanted to vote for Ronald McDonald? “I’d rather vote for that clown than those clowns in Canberra!” he said.

If anyone doubted we had a leadership problem, this election result should have changed that delusion.

Earlier this year, when early election talk was on, I argued that our economy, which was on the improve, didn’t need an early election. However, as the weeks dragged on and Malcolm was playing his double dissolution card, I thought he must have had a cunning plan of Black Adder proportions, which would’ve seen him in a stronger position with a less feral Senate.

I was wrong.

The economist in me pined for a government (even if it was Labor!) that had control of the Senate so we could pass Budgets that would beat the deficit/debt problems that one day, if not fixed, could see us lose our AAA-credit rating.

Given the kind of country we now have, with the issues its population care about and with the leaders we have, this isn’t going to happen until a great leader surfaces. It’s not Malcolm (I hate to say) and it’s not Bill or Anthony Albanese.

And it’s not Tanya Plibersek, though she has more potential than the lot above, but she’d need to start representing more Australians. She presents well, is smart and tough but she doesn’t relate to small and big business. She’s so ABC and her pitch is always for the left, the battlers, etc., when this country needs a leader who appeals to big and small business, right and middle of the road people and some sensible lefties, as well as those on struggle street.

Bob Hawke managed it and so did John Howard, but real lefties always hated him. That said, he appealed to enough Australians to win four elections and he was the PM that carried our economy forward, best explaining how we have grown for 25 years without a recession.

Of course, these are tougher times to be a PM.

David Cameron learnt it last week and so did Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott, but these people were never the leaders to appeal to a majority.

Ironically, Rudd learnt to win over the country but the people close to him (his own Labor team) despised him. But he didn’t lose out only because he was unlikeable. It was because he was a poor leader.

We need a great leader and we don’t need a half-hearted leader with a near-hung parliament. We need a great leader because the problems of this country that voters care about are many and complex.

Let’s go through them and here they are:

Climate change — some people think it’s the most important problem we have. On the other hand, devotees of Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones think it’s a big con job.
Older people want to know why the Government is hurting their super plans.
Younger people want older people to get less concessions, be taxed more on their super and to get out of their houses in suburbs where they want to live.
There are anti-Muslim and anti-immigration Australians.
There are scared Australians in an age of terror.
Some parents are concerned that their young son or daughter is unemployed and will never be able to buy a house.
There are Australians who are sick of being stuck in traffic going to work morning and night. But there are those who don’t want to give up their house for wider main arterial roads to get people to and from work faster each day.

Others want us to be a clever country encouraging entrepreneurs, who then create jobs and exports to help us grow our economy and pay off our national debt.
Some want lower penalty rates on weekends and public holidays, while others want these hospitality workers to be rewarded for not being with their family or in church on these days.
And there are worried Australians, who think our debt and deficit problems will come back to haunt us, which could force interest rates up.
And everybody wants international tax dodging companies to pay more tax, but no-one’s quite sure how to pull this one off.
I could go on but you can see what a great leader would have to address to come up with answers that a majority would like. I don’t think either Malcolm or Bill came out with a believable narrative to win over a majority with so many gripes. And there are many!

When I asked my Melbourne shopkeeper what he was most annoyed about he said, wait for it: “Parliamentarians can take their super before they retire from work tax-free and can keep on working, which is something we can’t do.”

He might not be 100% accurate on this subject, but it’s what he believes. At the heart of his complaint is that he thinks pollies look after themselves and don’t give a hoot about their so-called followers.

John Maxwell who wrote the book The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership says if a leader looks around and can’t see any followers, then he’s not a leader, he’s just going for a walk.

Everyday I receive emails from Malcolm Turnbull’s team and I haven’t read one of them! That’s the lesson Malcolm. Don’t listen to the ‘experts’ on the electorate or the media. You can see where that got you.

You don’t have to listen to Andrew Bolt either and resign, but Jonesy did give you good advice while he was doing the election coverage for Seven. Talk to your people, listen to them and tell them something optimistic — this is what his words effectively said when he was trying to get you out of your house on election night.

If you win this election, you have three years to become a leader and, as Einstein allegedly noted: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

I don’t care if he didn’t say this, it’s great advice and you really need great advice at the moment because what you’ve been receiving has been insanely bad.

Our economy needs strong, credible leadership, as it affects both consumer and business confidence, which feeds into investment, economic growth and jobs.

Your election war cry was about jobs and growth and now you have to make them happen, so let’s start on your leadership. It’s time to show some guts — get outside your comfort zone and become the leader this country is crying out for.

I’ve known you since we were both 21 at North Bondi Surf Club and I’ve always liked you, but your discomfort zone always looked like having to deal with the people you now have to lead.

One thing I learnt hanging around people in the surf club was when there was a big wave on and you had to race in it, someone would always say: “No guts, no glory!”

Our economy is doing well by international standards, but can it take a hung, lame duck Government with right-wing Libs ready to hang a lame duck leader?

Support and Legals